Smart City Governance and Infrastructure Analysis (2025)

Project Overview

Key Findings

This project analyzes the relationship between digital infrastructure (Internet Speed, Wi-Fi Access Points), economic prosperity (GDP Per Capita), and citizen perception of governance across four key global cities: Tokyo, Seoul, Mexico City, and São Paulo.

The analysis utilizes a comparative approach to challenge the assumption that a city's wealth or internet speed automatically translates into higher citizen satisfaction with 'smart' government solutions.

Correlation Challenge: Found no strong linear correlation between a city's average Internet Speed or the quantity of Free Wi-Fi Hotspots and its citizens' perception of smart governance.

  • The Governance Paradox: The wealthiest city (Tokyo) did not yield the highest citizen satisfaction scores, demonstrating that economic capacity does not guarantee perceived governance success.

  • Targeted Impact: Mexico City and São Paulo, despite lower economic metrics, showed significant perceived improvement in specific governance areas (e.g., citizen participation platforms), highlighting the importance of strategically focused technological implementation.

  • Seoul's Model: Seoul emerged as the leader, successfully aligning its economic prosperity with high citizen satisfaction across most governance metrics, particularly in efficiency and digital participation.

Siguiente
Siguiente

Conscious Smart Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Urban Resilience during COVID-19